30-06-2002 International Review of the Red Cross No. 846, p. 467-470 ICRC position on hostage-taking ![]() These guidelines set out the ICRC’s position with regard to hostage-taking in situations in connection with which it is conducting operations. Guidelines
The ICRC’s view of hostage-taking 1. The taking of hostages is prohibited by international humanitarian law (Article 34, Fourth Convention ; Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions ; Article 75(2c), Additional Protocol I ; and Article 4(2c), Additional Protocol II). 2. The ICRC condemns violations of international humanitarian law and of the principles of humanity and relevant law, especially those that affect or threaten people’s lives or well-being, as is the case with hostage-taking. In this area, as in all others, the ICRC is guided solely by the interests of the victims and the desire to relieve their suffering. Where hostage-taking has occurred, the organization’s involvement as a result may in no way be considered to sanction the practice, nor does it attenuate the seriousness of that act. 3. If it becomes involved in such a situation, the ICRC will remind the parties that hostage-taking is prohibited (by international humanitarian law and the principles of humanity and of relevant law), and will request that the hostages be released. Where appropriate, the ICRC will ask that priority be given to vulnerable categories of hostage, such as the injured, the sick and children. Conditions under which the ICRC can act 1. The ICRC can act either at the request of one party and with the explicit consent of the other, or following acceptance by all parties of its offer of services. 2. In situations where international humanitarian law does not apply, the ICRC will offer its services only if it is the sole body capable of taking action or believes itself to be particularly well placed so to do. 3. The ICRC will act only if it has adequate knowledge of the parties and is well enough accepted by them that it believes they will honour the undertakings that they will be required to give the ICRC (particularly those regarding the safety of its delegates) and only if the hostages have needs that the ICRC is in a position to meet. Possible role of the ICRC in the event of hostage-taking 1. The ICRC can :
— The parties themselves retain sole responsibility for all proposals forwarded and decisions taken, and ICRC delegates will not act as guarantors for the implementation of decisions or conditions set by the parties. The parties will be informed of these conditions. — Subject to prior authorization from headquarters, and following a thorough study of the situation, delegates may help implement certain aspects of agreements between the parties, such as returning freed hostages to their homes. 1. In situations covered by international humanitarian law in which hostages are being held by the authorities (e.g. in places that are part of the official prison system), the ICRC will request author-ization to carry out visits that conform to its usual procedures for visits to persons deprived of their freedom. In addition to making the recommendations that it normally makes in connection with the conditions of the people it visits in detention, the ICRC will generally request that the hostages be released. 2. In situations covered by international law and in which the hostage-takers appear not to be acting on the orders of the auth- orities, but where the hostages are nationals or sympathizers of the adversary :
Hostage-taking not related to international armed conflict or internal violence In general, the ICRC will not offer its services in the event of hostage-taking unrelated to an international armed conflict or internal violence. International Committee of the Red Cross |