Home
  English
  Arabic
  Russian
  Chinese
Help the victims of war: make a donation to the ICRC today!

News
Only press releases older than one year exist for this section.

Section
Terrorism and international humanitarian law
If committed in times of armed conflicts - international or non-international - acts commonly considered as terrorist, such as attacks on civilians, indiscriminate attacks, and the taking of hostages, are expressly prohibited by international humanitarian law. Similarly, if the fight against terrorism takes the form of an armed conflict, it is regulated by international humanitarian law: both in terms of conduct of hostilities and in terms of protection to be afforded to captured persons.


The application of international humanitarian law does not constitute an obstacle to the fight against terrorism. Indeed, suspected terrorists can be prosecuted for acts of terrorism. But even the members of armed forces or "unlawful combatants" suspected of acts of terrorism are protected by the Geneva Conventions and are entitled to judicial guarantees if put on trial.

Key document
    21-7-2005
    The relevance of IHL in the context of terrorism
    Events in recent years have increased interest in the issue of how international humanitarian law is applied in today's context of violent confrontation. In a new paper, the ICRC provides answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about international humanitarian law and terrorism.
    (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Terrorism)
    Official Statement

    5-5-2004
    International humanitarian law and terrorism: questions and answers
    What does IHL say about terrorism? - Does IHL specifically mention terrorism? - Is the "war on terrorism" an armed conflict? - What law applies to persons detained in the fight against terrorism? - What is the ICRC's role with respect to persons detained in the fight against terrorism?
    (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development)

    31-10-2002
    What does humanitarian law say about terrorism?
    Extract from ICRC publication "International humanitarian law: answers to your questions"
    (Humanitarian law\IHL in brief)

FAQ
    15-11-2002
    What is ICRC's position on terrorism?
    ICRC strongly condemns acts of violence which are indiscriminate and spread terror among the civilian population. It has voiced its condemnation of such acts on many occasions, including after the attacks in the USA on 11 September 2001.
    (Info resources\Frequently asked questions)
    FAQ

International Review of the Red Cross
    30-6-2007
    Lessons for human rights and humanitarian law in the war on terror: comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings case
    The article examines and compares two recent judgments which provide some of the most valuable examples of the difficulties surrounding the application of international humanitarian law to the phenomenon of terrorism: the Hamdan judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Targeted Killings judgment of the Supreme Court of Israel. Both judgments deal with the thresholds of applicability of the law of armed conflict, as well as with the concept of unlawful combatancy and the relationship between human rights law and humanitarian law.
    (Info resources\International Review\2007 - No. 866)
    International Review of the Red CrossMarko Milanovic Includes PDF

    31-12-2006
    International treaties against terrorism and the use of terrorism during armed conflict and by armed forces
    Terrorism-oriented legislation, which initially covered only acts affecting civilians, has gradually expanded to cover some acts of terrorism against military personnel and installations. This contribution attempts to assess the repercussions of this evolution on the status and the protection of armed forces engaged in the so-called ‘‘war on terrorism’’ by examining the existing dynamic between these regulations and international humanitarian law.
    (Info resources\International Review\2006 - No. 864)
    International Review of the Red CrossDaniel O’Donnell Includes PDF

    30-9-2005
    Use of nuclear and radiological weapons by terrorists?
    The hurdles for terrorists to get a nuclear weapon are extremely high. The probability of terrorist use of such a weapon is therefore extremely low. In contrast to the nuclear weapon case there are in principle no insurmountable obstacles to the acquisition and use of radiological weapons by a well-organized terrorist group, even though such an action remains high-tech and thus very difficult.
    (Info resources\International Review\2005 - No. 859)
    International Review of the Red CrossChristoph Wirz, Emmanuel Egger Includes PDF

    31-3-2005
    Casting light on the legal black hole: International law and detentions abroad in the “war on terror”
    In the deprivation of liberty by agents acting outside the sovereign territory of their State, the prevention of violations of fundamental norms and values is particularly important.
    (Info resources\International Review\2005 - No. 857)
    International Review of the Red CrossSilvia Borelli Includes PDF

    31-3-2005
    Human rights and indefinite detention
    International human rights law abhors a legal black hole. It applies wherever a State exercises its jurisdiction, not only in peacetime but also during armed conflict, as a compliment to humanitarian law. The deprivation of liberty is subject to certain conditions, and even initially lawful detention becomes arbitrary and contrary to law if it is not subject to periodic review.
    (Info resources\International Review\2005 - No. 857)
    International Review of the Red CrossAlfred de Zayas Includes PDF

    30-9-2002
    Doubtful prisoner-of-war status
    This article explores how doubt over prisoner-of-war status may arise and how issues relating to the determination of status should be resolved according to the Third Geneva Convention. In this context, a State's obligations in cases of "doubtful" status are examined, as are the minimal requirements of a "competent tribunal".
    (Info resources\International Review\2002 - No. 847)
    International Review of the Red CrossYasmin Naqvi Includes PDF

    30-9-2002
    Acts of terror, "terrorism" and international humanitarian law
    This article examines the international humanitarian law applicable to acts of terror. All acts of terror committed during international or non-international armed conflicts are prohibited without exception. In addition, the author argues that State responses to terrorist acts are also regulated by international humanitarian law when carried out during an armed conflict.
    (Info resources\International Review\2002 - No. 847)
    International Review of the Red CrossHans-Peter Gasser Includes PDF

    30-9-2002
    Just war, war of aggression and international humanitarian law
    This article relates the history of the rules and principles adopted to limit violence, and of those prohibiting recourse to war. The author explains that the applicability of international humanitarian law does not depend on a war's causes, even in the case of a war of aggression, and that no discrimination is admissible regarding the law's application.
    (Info resources\International Review\2002 - No. 847)
    International Review of the Red CrossFrançois Bugnion Includes PDF

Interview
Legal article
Official Statement
Press article
    19-5-2004
    Protecting life and dignity: "No war is above international law"
    Jakob Kellenberger, ICRC president, says the organization condemns indiscriminate terrorist attacks unreservedly, but insists that the response to them must remain within the framework of the law. Article published in the Financial Times (UK) on 19 May 2004 and reproduced here with the FT's kind permission.
    (Humanitarian law\Reaffirmation and development)
    Press articleJakob Kellenberger

    1-3-2004
    "War" doesn't justify Guantanamo
    Article by Gabor Rona, legal adviser at the ICRC’s legal division, as published in the Financial Times on 1 March 2004
    (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Terrorism)
    Press articleGabor Rona

Report
Other site
    19-5-2006
    Strategic Foresight Group
    Strategic Foresight Group is a think tank that conducts research and launches policy change initiatives to help decision makers to anticipate and influence the future in uncertain times.
    (Info resources\Other sites\Non-governmental organizations)
    Other site



go to top of page
© 2008  International Committee of the Red Cross
2-12-2008